Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen3.8 Flash
Qwen3.7 Plus (Qwen) versus Qwen3.8 Flash (Qwen): API pricing, context window, capabilities and uptime, from the same data as each model page, at the SoleAPI default channel price. Input costs 1.2 Credits / M for Qwen3.7 Plus and 0.48 Credits / M for Qwen3.8 Flash, so Qwen3.8 Flash is 60% cheaper. Context windows are 1M and 1M.
Specs side by side
| Item | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input (prompt) · Credits / M | 1.2≈ $0.182 | 0.48≈ $0.0727 |
| Output (completion) · Credits / M | 4.8≈ $0.727 | 1.62≈ $0.245 |
| Cache read · Credits / M | 0.24 | 0.06 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 128K |
| 7-day uptime | 98.8% | — |
| Latest probe latency | 1.96 s | — |
| Measured throughput | 56.2 t/s | 44.2 t/s |
| Protocols | Anthropic Messages | Anthropic Messages |
| Sample monthly cost (10M in + 2M out) | 21.6≈ $3.27 | 8.04≈ $1.22 |
Prices are the SoleAPI default channel price in Credits (1 Credit = ¥1); green marks the better side. Uptime and latency come from SoleAPI probes; a dash means the model is not probed yet.
Capabilities
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Plus or Qwen3.8 Flash?
At the SoleAPI default channel price, Qwen3.7 Plus input costs 1.2 Credits / M and Qwen3.8 Flash input costs 0.48 Credits / M, so Qwen3.8 Flash is 60% cheaper. Output and cache prices are in the specs table above.
Which has the larger context window, Qwen3.7 Plus or Qwen3.8 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Plus offers 1M tokens, Qwen3.8 Flash offers 1M tokens.
Can I switch between Qwen3.7 Plus and Qwen3.8 Flash at any time?
Yes. SoleAPI calls every model with the same API key; switching is just changing the model field in the request, and billing is split per model in one console.
How do the capabilities of Qwen3.7 Plus and Qwen3.8 Flash differ?
Their capability flags are identical. Every other capability is either supported by both or by neither; see the capability table above.
More comparisons
One API key for both Qwen3.7 Plus and Qwen3.8 Flash
Free credits on sign-up, pay as you go, no monthly fee.